A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving potential neighbours about the construction of a wall at a coastal website in a north Dublin suburb, a circumstance which includes captivated countrywide consideration subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children residence at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental considerations, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier and also the Irish Situations post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has progressed right into a really publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development will work at the internet site on Dublin Road, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, search for to develop their relatives dwelling. The case has become emblematic of wider disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, exactly where growth pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of established citizens. According to the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying constructed by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted below planning permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally residents of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their organizing permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries in their web-site, resulting in an encroachment on a Exclusive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as a result places are subject to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental regulation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have Long lasting ecological penalties, particularly inside a delicate coastal atmosphere for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach in their arranging authorization, and say the wall, that is partially constructed, is in the proper position. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding as a way to preserve their see, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal organizing disputes, wherever views of The ocean are the two highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained dramatic endeavours with the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the location, In keeping with sworn proof referenced within the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-superior drinking water through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, a picture that has since come to be emblematic from the depth of the dispute. These actions weren't just symbolic; they ended up meant to gather visual evidence of your wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from the sea Irish Situations described, describing how the two Guys entered the h2o through serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm drinking water to photograph the internet site turned The most putting descriptions to arise from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely observed that such steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a place impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was being encroached upon.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were coated in detail because of the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 became broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the track record and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant during the lawful timeline.
Within the Main on the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as built, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and conditions hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is inspired by concern for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting alternatively that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their very long-standing connection to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few simply looking to build a household home in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Area of Conservation and say that all performs are actually carried out depending on Qualified advice and authorized strategies. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above building of wall at coastal web site is becoming a shorthand description for the predicament that lots of observers see as increasingly common. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Beforehand been associated with nearby advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very diverse Expert backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of René Collier waist-significant water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom ought to ascertain whether or not the wall as designed complies with setting up authorization and no matter if any encroachment right into a Specific Spot of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning disorders. Nonetheless the human aspect stays central: neighbours who should live together with each other lengthy once the authorized expenses happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend outside of that deal with. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental safety and residence rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre from the dispute stands partially designed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.