A bitter High Court dispute has broken out in between future neighbours above the development of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide notice subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of preparing breaches, environmental considerations, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Situations post about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction works at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to develop their relatives property. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their planning permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have lasting ecological outcomes, particularly in the delicate coastal atmosphere for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially developed, is in the right placement. Their legal staff has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The pair accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal setting up disputes, where sights of The ocean are both of those highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary endeavours via the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the website, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-high h2o through a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances, an image which includes considering that grow to be emblematic from the depth on the dispute. These actions were not merely symbolic; they ended up intended to Assemble visual proof on the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Times described, describing how the two Adult men entered the water all through critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the location became Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times was becoming encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were coated intimately because of the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 became widely searched phrases as readers sought to comprehend the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key moment within the legal timeline.
In the core from the dispute is actually a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as constructed, goes beyond what was authorized and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has long been called meticulous in his assessment of scheduling paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is inspired by concern for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few simply looking to build a household home in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Specific Space of Conservation and say that all operates are performed according to Specialist suggestions and authorised programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean all through a storm, do not alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of construction of wall at coastal site is becoming a shorthand description to get a condition that lots of observers see as progressively prevalent. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation between private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats has started to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier observed the businessman had previously been involved with local advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Occasions post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly various Expert backgrounds can discover them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have grown to be synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Situations protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of waist-superior h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances and René Collier waded through waistline-superior water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these actions shown commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings keep on, the outcome stays uncertain. The court should ascertain whether or not the wall as designed complies with scheduling permission and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and planning conditions. Yet the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who have to live together with each other long once the authorized fees happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building works at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the case lengthen further than that tackle. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Furthermore, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental protection and property rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it can in the end be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will count on the court docket’s findings. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to One of the more intently viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.